Democracy As we explore the different but similar worlds of Monarchy and Democracy, Monarchy is described as an individual ruler who functions as the head of state and who achieves his position through heredity. Monarchy is a form of government in which supreme authority is vested in a single and usually hereditary figure, such as a king, and whose powers can vary from those of an absolute despot to those of a figure head.
Any feedback or criticism would be appreciated!
Sorry for the length. The answer rests both in the popular opinion that democratic republics are superior to monarchies, and the misconception that monarchies themselves are inevitable expedients to tyranny and oppression.
In fact, the limited monarchy is the most effective system of government, fully capable of functioning efficiently in the modern world. First let us assess the current form of government in the United States, a republic.
In a nation of citizens, should not the head of state be democratically elected by those citizens? The republic is certainly not without its benefits. A democratically elected legislative branch justly allows the taxpaying citizens political influence, so that they may uphold common liberties and laws, and safeguard their nation against possible tyranny.
So too can the politicians through lobbyists espouse the private interests of individuals and communities. The replacement of inept officials is a peaceful process and guided by the collective spirit of the populace, so that a corrupt administration may be purged by an honest people.
Nevertheless, the method of electing officials in a republic is fundamentally flawed. The majority of citizens vote according to 1 their socioeconomic position and education, 2 the influence of their parents, 3 outside social influences, and 4 the attraction of the candidate.
The first and most influential criterion demonstrates the primary problem of the republic. Voters with greater education, motivation, and political understanding have greater tendency to be positioned at the upper end of the socioeconomic scale; therefore they are also in the minority.
The financially restrained lower and working classes, having less time in which to educate themselves on politics, dominate a large portion of the majority.
Even the middle classes through scholarship are subjected to inevitable prejudice and indoctrination.
They are unlikely to question the influences of their education and pursue independent political intellectualism. It follows that as political candidates are elected by the majority, they are ultimately chosen by less politically competent citizens.
As large a role as parents, friends, and community values play in encouraging civic activism, so too do they in influencing political ideology.
This discouragement of free thinking and uncompromising voting tendency becomes problematic in the instance of an unjust or ineffective government where unprejudiced civic activism is necessary.
Aesthetics, appealing to the vanity of the rich and the aforementioned political ignorance of the poor, holds significant influence in popular elections. Such factors are not indicators of competence or integrity; charisma and affluence serve as the best expedients to power for the ambitious or corrupt politician.
Considering these means by which men are elected to office, it is as irrational to democratically elect the most powerful man in the nation as it is to grant him unrestrained authority. In effect, the will of the minority as represented by the defeated parties becomes negligible and irreconcilable factions are formed.
In retaliation, presidents are restricted by their term limit. This is a double-edged sword: Experienced office-holders are continually replaced with the inexperienced; their instituted policies, be they beneficial or injurious, reversed according to the whim of the subsequent administration.
On a whole, such a government becomes increasingly detrimental to the progress and unity of the nation. Remember, democracy never lasts long.
It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself.
Comparing and Contrasting Monarchy vs. Democracy. As we explore the different but similar worlds of Monarchy and Democracy, Monarchy is described as an individual ruler who functions as the head of state and who achieves his position through heredity.4/4(1). Democracy is a system of government for the people to choose their leaders and to hold their leaders responsible for their policies they enforce in office. The people decide who will represent them in congress and or parliament who will head the government at the national and local levels. Monarchy vs Democracy. One of the most remarkable system founded by humans is the establishment of organized society. In early period of human history, a set of people that makes a group or pack are scavenging and hunting for their food, and as soon as they have develop their understanding of their environment they decided to settle on respective places.
There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide. Monarchs are enduring symbols of stableness, continuity and national identity.
Their station warrants the highest respect, ensuring the integrity of the state.Differences between Monarchy and Democracy 1. Democracy is a type of government that emanates from the constituted powers that are elected, depending on the system (presidentialist, parliamentary, constitutional monarchy, semi presidentialist, semi parliamentary, etc) directly or indirectly by the people.
1 - Differences Between Monarchy and Democracy introduction. Democracy is a type of government that emanates from the constituted powers that are elected, depending on the system (presidentialist, parliamentary, constitutional monarchy, semi presidentialist, semi parliamentary, etc ) directly or indirectly by the people.
Whereas in an absolute monarchy. Nov 21, · Difference between research paper and literary analysis 5th standard english essays henry v act 4 scene 1 analysis essay essay on makar sankranti in kannada teachers lyric essay seneca review editor write new criticism essay true blue years of service and sacrifice essay essay my favourite person mahatma gandhi 12 page essay on guns rights.
Monarchy vs Democracy. One of the most remarkable system founded by humans is the establishment of organized society. In early period of human history, a set of people that makes a group or pack are scavenging and hunting for their food, and as soon as they have develop their understanding of their environment they decided to settle on respective places.
The Federal Reserve System: Modern Fascism And Absolute Power Essay - Most Americans feel the United States of America is a beacon of democracy and raw capitalism, the leader of the “free” world. The aviator ocd essays. Is our behaviour due to nature or nurture essay Is our behaviour due to nature or nurture essay, construction sociale du genre dissertation un exemple de dissertation explicative 16th century puritan beliefs essay intermarriage essay.
Action essay from hermeneutics in text serzenish malatya dissertation structural functional approach social stratification essay end of.