The computer science elective courses were moved to Group 4 as a full course from first examinations in Courses offered at both SL and HL:
Do not instantly seize upon a title that sounds appealing and plunge into it headlong. Instead, read carefully all titles that is, all topics or questions on the list. Remember that you may not change the title to something else that you wish you had been asked, but must respond to what the IB has given.
What are the key words or concepts? Are there key words of the Theory of Knowledge course in the title -- words such as "belief", "justification", or "truth"? Are you clear about what they mean? Are you aware of ambiguities, or of possible alternative meanings?
Think back on class discussions and check class notes. How are the key concepts related to each other? Put the title into your own words to make sure you understand what is being asked.
Do not even consider skipping this step. What exactly are you being told to do? What are the key words of instruction? If you are told to "analyse" or "evaluate" a claim, then you are supposed to consider the arguments both for and against it, taking into account any ambiguities interpreting it.
Possible responses, for example: If you are asked "to what extent" or "in what way" the statement is justified, then you are being asked the same thing, but in different words.
If you are being asked a question directly "Is x true? If you are asked to "compare" areas of knowledge or ways of knowing, justifications, methodologies, or the like, you are being asked to examine both similarities and differences in response to the title.
In some cases, the "how" question is simply a variation of "in what way? Ultimately, all titles in Theory of Knowledge, no matter how they are phrased, ask you to do the same thing. You are being asked to think critically about major issues of knowledge. These instructions tell you exactly what you are expected to do in your essay: Always justify your statements and provide relevant examples to illustrate your arguments, and remember to consider what can be said against them.
If you use external sources, cite them according to a recognized convention. Examiners mark essays against the title as set. Respond to the title as given; do not alter it in any way.
Your essay must be between and words in length. Pay attention to the description of the top mark in each of the six criteria in order to set your goals for an appropriate essay.
It does you little good to play a brilliant game of football if you are being assessed on playing tennis. Note that the first two criteria emphasized in importance by being given double knowledge implied by the prescribed title is at the core of the Knowledge Issue s criterion, and that analysis and evaluation are at the core of the Quality of Analysis criterion.
This is a crucial step. Look at the descriptions of the zeroes in the Assessment Criteria! Do you understand clearly what a "problem of knowledge" is?
If not, re-read the explanation: Uncertainties and difficulties are an integral part of our search for knowledge, and may even depending on your values make it more humanly interesting. Do not treat an area of knowledge as inherently inferior simply because it is more difficult to assert that we can know something in that area than it is in others.
Do all cultures see these problems in the same way? What comparisons can you draw, what general conclusions do you reach, and what arguments can be made against those conclusions? What are the implications of your main points?
Can you find examples to illustrate your arguments? Note down your ideas quickly, without trying to structure them yet. Write until your mind runs dry.
To illustrate your points, gather examples from notes and texts from your other IB courses, the media, people you know, your personal experience, and any other relevant sources.
Keep track of the sources of your examples and of any ideas you gather in this stage, so that you can include them as citation later if necessary. Remember, though, that the TOK essay is not a research paper.Sep 23, · Six steps to writing a good tok essay.
Six steps to writing a good tok essay. Supreme court cases italicized essay parts of a research paper apa yang.
Essay on social media privacy literary life of virginia woolf essays essay on harmful effect of junk food e46 m3 supercharger essay hadaka shitsuji good endings to essays (nancy mairs. Jan 16, · Writing is an art form created by past experiences, future hopes, fantasies, and limitless imagination.
It brings feelings, knowledge, adventure, mystery, and foreign times and places to life. At the Argentinean Billionaire's Bidding, India Grey Child Development, Shyam Sunder Shrimali Hitori and Sudoku, Nikoli Insight to Success, William J. Smith Pills and Potions ABC French Bk The following structure is a very good, step-by-step method you can use on any ToK essay to get very high marks.
Woods, Tim. “How to Structure a Theory of Knowledge Essay” IBMastery. IBMastery, 1 Jan Web. The students have really struggled with the essay writing process and your site structures it better than anything else I. GOING FOR GOLD. SIX STEPS. TO. A REALLY GOOD.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE ESSAY. Myth: Every subject requires a different kind of essay. Fact: Although there are some surface differences in approach, all IB subjects, the Extended Essay, and Theory of Knowledge demand some fundamental qualities in a good essay.
To choose between A-levels and International Baccalaureate, is your child a specialist or an all-rounder? The IB is divided into six groups: language, second language, individuals and societies, mathematics and computer science, experimental sciences and the arts.